Muito bom podem comprar sem medo chegou antes da data e fucionou perfeitamente.

It works as advertised, I regret not having gone for a touch screen computer, though

Garmin competitor at a more realistic price. Works great, extremely long battery life. Supplier included a complimentary rubber cover which is much appreciated.

Exactamente lo que nesecitaba, 100% lo recomiendo

I have purchased this product recently, but so far I am impressed with its quality and precision. I just acknowledge the comments others have written about it.Just want to add the iGS application is wonderful. Ride data analysis is impressive!

UPDATE: I've had the BSC200 for 6 months now and have used it multiple times each week (sometimes daily) over that time. Over that period I have always used 3 GPS units for each ride--the BSC200, a Garmin 530, and my Amazfit GTR 4 (which has an advanced dual-band, circularly-polarized GPS antenna). I live in the mountains and many GPS units have very poor accuracy on trails in my area. As I probably stated in my original review, I consider my GTR 4 to be the most accurate GPS device I currently own. So here's my update--the BSC200 is still beating my Garmin 530 on trails. The Garmin isn't even bad, but when you examine the recorded tracks from each unit, it is pretty easy to see that the Garmin's tracks are not as smooth due to it not recording switchbacks accurately. The main reason why I'm updating this review today is because I just got back in from a 1.5 hour ride over some tough trails in the mountains. My GTR 4 and the BSC200 had only a .05 mile difference, whilst the Garmin was .18 shorter than the GTR 4. I'm happy with all 3, but literally EVERY mtb ride over the past 6 months, the BSC200 and the GTR4 are very close whilst the Garmin always reports the shortest distance. I generally see these types of results regardless of where I ride, but today was through an especially challenging area (for GPS). After coming home, I studied each track carefully. The BSC200 is surprisingly solid on mountain trails which is the most brutal scenario for most GPS. There are still quite a few features I haven't tested, but I'm impressed with the BSC200's accuracy. I'm not suggesting it is an overall better device than the Garmin 530, only that for trail riding in the mountains, it seems to be more accurate and records with more fidelity than the 530 under those trying conditions.ORIGINAL REVIEW:I'm a retired ultra-runner & currently a frequent cyclist (road & mtb). I've been testing and using consumer GPS since the first Garmin Forerunner. I currently ride (nearly daily) with at least 3 GPS units (Garmin Edge 530, Coospo BC107, and an Amazfit GTR 4 smartwatch). I also own an IGPSport IGS50S and countless other units long retired.I only recently received the IGPSport BSC200 so I'm sharing my initial thoughts (and test results); I routinely update my reviews 4 or 5 times as I test more thoroughly. If & when I find bad things about this GPS unit, I will share it here.That said, my initial impressions are positive. The screen is legible in direct sunlight and the backlight works great. The BSC200 basically imitates the buttons of the Garmin 530 (up/down buttons, select, back, begin activity, & lap) but the button layout is slightly different. I really like the BSC200 buttons. Unlike many budget GPS units (e.g. the IGPSport 50S & Coospo BC107) the BSC200's buttons have a very nice tactile feel; you can feel them click and they're true buttons and not just a soft membrane. Some of the buttons are slightly recessed which isn't a problem for me, but MIGHT be less desirable for some people who use gloves frequently. The BSC200 is the only non-Garmin GPS unit I've had that allows me to customize the data fields. This is a really big "positive" as I'm able to see exactly the data I want and not have to deal with tiny data fields I can barely read and don't care about. Customizing is extremely simple (simpler than Garmin IMHO) via the IGPSport app. Not only can you customize each page of data fields, you can also set it up to auto rotate through each page or stay on one unless you use a button to see the others. I've used the IGPSport apps for years and it's okay. You can set it to sync to Strava (and probably some other apps I don't use), but unlike Garmin Connect, you'll need to open the IGPSport app to get the auto-sync underway. The IGPSport app doesn't compare to Garmin Connect or Strava, but it'll display your ride data just fine--and it syncs to Strava fine (just like Garmin). The app allows you to set up the BSC200 and push your profile, etc. to the unit which simplifies things quite a bit. I'm not the biggest fan of the app, but in fairness, it is simple to use and it works perfectly fine. I never bothered reading the manual, but I easily got my heart rate monitor paired within 1 minute at the trailhead. That's probably important to note--the IGPSport BSC200 worked flawlessly with my BT HRM. I use speed & cadence sensors on my road bike and will ultimately test those sensors as well.The BSC200 has a number of important features that I haven't tested--probably the most important is navigation. I will test that feature, but as I never personally use it on my Garmin 530, I need more time to put together a decent test.My initial tests involve GPS accuracy, and the BSC200 performed well. I live in the foothills between the Appalachian and Cumberland mountains (a challenging environment for GPS). I want to test this unit on the road, gravel, and single-track. Over the past ~20 years of testing GPS units I've found that most units perform accurately on road, but fidelity deteriorates on gravel and especially single-track as tree canopy, mountains, and switchbacks each negatively impact signal & reveal data recording limitations. I tested the BSC200 against the units referenced in the first paragraph. I had the Garmin 530 on the left side of the handlebars and the BSC200 on the right. I carried the Coospo in my jersey, and the Amazfit is a watch. Of all those GPS units, the Amazfit is the most capable (GPS-wise) given it has a dual-band antenna. Over the course of my ~9.5 mile gravel ride on the side of a mountain, the BSC200 stayed either spot-on with the Garmin 530 or only within .01 each mile. At the end, my Amazfit read 9.54, the Garmin 530= 9.49, the IGPSport BSC200= 9.51, and the Coospo= 9.38. I'm exceptionally happy with that result. I will test on single-track next, and that will be the most telling. I ride in the mountains and entry-level GPS just can't handle it. I have very high confidence in both my GTR4 and Garmin 530 to provide a baseline. I'll update this review probably within a week with that info.

My last bike computer is iGPSPORT BSC100S, the one that does not have a screen film on the pictures. It was good enough, but I always wanted one with an embedded navigator, since when I used a phone navigation I could not hear the voiced instructions and using earphones was not safe.I trust the iGPSPORT brand, thus I've bought iGPSPORT BSC200. It's not expensive and a colorful display is not a necessary feature for me, I prefer contrast pictures. The gadget is a bit smaller and thinner than BSC100S and BSC200 does not have a noticeable PWM issues like BSC100S has, that is good, compare with BSC100S' PWM well visible on the picture. Unfortunately the display has the low resolution and its working size is less than the physical size.The measurements are accurate, even more accurate than in BSC100S - if the last one exports data to Strava, the values there are different, whereas BSC200 exported data is shown by Strava equally.Let me advice. Avoid building a route with a destination point at a start point, otherwise the navigator will report a finish at start point. Also avoid building a self-crossing route, otherwise a crossing point may confuse the navigating software, that wants to guide you through the shortest way when you cross a route.Pros:- Excellent for its price, that is at least 3 times less than other.- Compact sizes.- Contrast display.- 6 functional buttons, you pick actions from the menu, don't have to remember actions associated with 2 buttons and how long to press them.- 8 pre-set screens, all are tunable, removable and addable.- Long lasting battery.- A lot of sensors, the pressure sensor is sensitive and accurately measures descents and ascents.- Embedded accelerometer, it eliminates the need to turn on the gadget in the sleep mode.- It can store many rotes, the computer can be used with stored routes w/o a phone.- The app iGPSPORT can import routes that are built with other software.Cons:- Unnecessary gray background on screens.- Warns 200m/0,12mi/650ft before a turn, but does not warn at a turn.Subjective:- Low resolution screen.- The map in the iGPSPORT app can't search for addresses in the USA, you can only pick point in the map.- The iGPSPORT app's map needs the Internet, if you ride in wild areas, you have to build routes in advance.- You may have to use other map software if the above cases are not for you.With all these pros, cons and my subjective opinions, I like the computer and will use it as long as it works well.