Your cart is empty.
Your cart is empty.Passive Splitting with Quality Eclipse Transformer Harnessing the full potential of an Eclipse ET-MS10 transformer, Radial's passive ProMS2 delivers professional-grade clarity for microphone splitting. Its nickel-laminated core lies at the heart of the ET-MS10 transformer's ultra-low harmonic distortion while suppressing phase shift and removing bandwidth limitations you'd get from budget mic splitters. In fact, we're talking about 115dB of common-mode noise rejection backed by a MuMETAL-shield in one of Radial Engineering's freakishly tough steel enclosures. The ProMS2 rejects RFI, EMI, DC line noise, and ground-loop hum with heroic efficiency. If you're setting up a whole bank of mic splitters, then Sweetwater has what you need. Check out these rackmountable Radial J-Rak chassis.Radial Engineering ProMS2 Passive Microphone Splitter Features: Passive microphone splitter with 2 through and 1 isolated output Ideal for splitting a single microphone to 3 destinations (e.g., main, monitor, and broadcast mixers) Also great for splitting 1 microphone to
Dan Dreifort
Reviewed in the United States on March 25, 2021
I got this and a similar device made by ART. Nothing wrong with the Radial, but there’s nothing wrong with the ART either, and I paid only $16 for it from Amazon. Somebody had returned it. I think they usually cost closer to $50.I’m sure if you care about ridiculous fidelity at the high end, the radial is probably measurably better, but if you care that much, then you should probably pay the extra $100 for the even better transformer in the even higher-end radial model. … I guess what I’m saying is, if you really care about sound, skip this and get the better one, and if your ears aren’t super human, skip this and get the cheaper transformer splitter. Note: ART also makes a splitter that doesn’t use transformer. Avoid that one.If I had to do it again, not needing that crazy fidelity, I would skip the Radial and save the money.I guess the only other thing to note is that the enclosure of this radial is bigger, stronger,And probably better built, but That’s not necessarily an advantage for my delicate, small home studio use.
Kunde
Reviewed in the United States on February 5, 2020
I'm sure that Radial ProMS2 is good, but they just sent me another product, Radial Catapult Mini TX...
Just another shopper
Reviewed in the United States on October 5, 2020
This did the trick. I needed to split a single mic and send it a two separate isolated sources. Working perfectly as advertised and well constructed.
warren l.
Reviewed in the United States on January 2, 2020
Top notch
Mr X
Reviewed in Canada on August 1, 2019
Radial makes quality gear and this is no exception!!
Jacques Sewrey
Reviewed in the United States on November 20, 2019
Anything Radial makes is just great!
Marin Codin Deboveanu
Reviewed in Canada on November 10, 2019
Radial equals very good quality. Period. I never hesitate to buy Radial, and same thing applies with this mic splitter. The signal remain clean and strong in both outputs.
LA Musician
Reviewed in the United States on September 28, 2017
Very well made and versatile mic splitter. The unit has two outputs allowing you to send the mic signal to two different inputs, such as a PA and a separate recorder at the same time, which is very convenient and useful.
bdonkadonk
Reviewed in the United States on May 21, 2017
I love all Radial products I've used so far (passive and active DI's, splitters, BT-Pro, and a few others) because they're clean, built like tanks, and reliable. The ProMS2 is no exception. It is very much worth the extra cost (compared to cheaper, bare bones DI boxes).
Wade Wilkinson
Reviewed in the United States on September 22, 2015
A nice piece of gear, unfortunately my friend, a sales rep, told me he would have sold it to me for half the price.
Recommended Products
